Bentz Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
Claimant, Anna Bentz, was refused unemployment compensation benefits by the bureau, the referee, and the Board of Review because of her refusal of an offer of suitable work within the meaning of section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(a). Claimant has appealed.
Claimant was laid off on February 10, 1959, due to a lack of work. Her last employer was Pauker Boys’ Wear, Philadelphia. On March 26, 1959, claimant, who had been unemployed for more than six weeks, was referred to the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Philadelphia, for a position…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brilhart Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Sweeney Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Merck & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Pompa Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Reed Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Belle State Bank v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Trexler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re PotvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Barillaro v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.