Legal Opinion

Conti v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1234 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Antonio Conti has appealed from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying him unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that he refused to accept suitable employment without good cause. We affirm.

Mr. Conti was last employed by Louis Goldsmith as a bushelman, a skilled position involving the alteration of garments. His last day of employment was October 13, 1978, at which time Goldsmith went out of business. Mr. Conti then applied for and was granted unemployment compensation benefits at the rate of $143.00 per week. On March 6,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shay v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Barillaro v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Eichman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Barr Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Toporovich Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellwood City Hospital v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. A.M.P. Seader v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Raffaele v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API