Legal Opinion
State v. Senske
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 1, 2005No. A03-1677PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from sentences imposed on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct committed in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (2002). The appeal has been remanded to this court for reconsideration in light of Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.--, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Appellant William Senske was charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (2002) (sexual penetration of a child under the age of 13 by a person more…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. WagenerIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. CalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CubiasWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CubiasWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KahapeaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KeeneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.