State v. Keene
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] The question before us is this: Is a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury, as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and its progeny, violated by the imposition of consecutive sentences for separate crimes, resulting from judicial rather than jury fact-finding? We conclude that no constitutional violation occurs as long as the sentence for each individual crime does not exceed the statutory maximum imposed by the Legislature for that crime, even when the aggregate sentence exceeds the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State of Maine v. Theodore S. StanislawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- State v. WardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.