Nicholson v. Bailey
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, District Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The action is based on a “Second Amended Complaint,” hereinafter referred to as “complaint,” filed by the plaintiff on October 9, 1958, and a counterclaim by the defendant filed on November 26, 1958. The complaint, in essence, alleges infringement of plaintiff’s U. S. Plant Patent 625 relating to a certain navel orange tree producing oranges designated as “Dream Navels,” as well as unfair competition in aggravation of the infringement, and seeks damages and a permanent injunction.
The counterclaim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- International Nickel Company v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Oil Well Improvements Co. v. Acme Foundry & MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. LemonsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Yoder Brothers, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Crossappellants. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Crossappellants v. Yoder Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Miller v. DAYBROOK-OTTAWA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.