Legal Opinion
Oil Well Improvements Co. v. Acme Foundry & MacHine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1929No. 8274PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
The Oil Well Improvements Company secured a decree against the Acme Foundry & Machine Company, finding infringement of patent No. 1,-165,253 (Alfred Gr. Heggem) for an oil well casing head. That decree was affirmed by this court [2 F.(2d) 530], and the matter then proceeded to an accounting to ascertain profits and damages. For that purpose, reference was to a master who recommended recovery on three items: For profits of defendant, $4,000; for damages by reason of sales lost to plaintiff, $35,738.64; for damages because of loss through selling price reduction by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Acme Foundry & Machine Co. v. Oil Well Improvements Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Livesay Window Company, Inc. v. Livesay Industries, Inc., and Everett G. Livesay Window Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Warner v. Tennessee Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.