Legal Opinion
Miller v. DAYBROOK-OTTAWA CORPORATION
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 17, 1968No. C 65-226PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON J. YOUNG, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 2,450,152, issued September 28, 1948, to Howard B. Miller. The patent involves devices referred to colloquially (to plaintiffs’ pleasure and defendants’ discomfiture) as “cherry picker” cranes. 1 The parties involved are FMC Corporation, formerly known as Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation, which boasts that it is one of the sixty largest corporations in the country, and Daybrook-Ottawa Corporation, a subsidiary of the Young Spring and Wire Corporation of Delaware, which is also a corporation of some…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wine Railway Appliance Co. v. Enterprise Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- General Electric Company v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Smith v. Dental Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Vincent I. Whitman v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc., a Corporation Walter E. Disney, an Individual John Doe OneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Bandag, Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Wafer Shave, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Tapco Products Company v. Van Mark Products Corporation and Eugene Van CleaveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation (No. II)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.