Legal Opinion

Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 1, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-83; Court 06-00048PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors challenge the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) respondent selection determinations in the third administrative review of the anti-dumping duty order covering softwood lumber from Canada. Defendant and defendant-intervenor move, pursuant to US-CIT Rule 12(b)(1), to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

I. Background

The third review currently is proceeding with final results due in September, 2006 (or December, 2006 if extended). It…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Skf USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Chemsol, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Government of the People's Republic of China v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API