Legal Opinion

Witz v. Dale

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1891No. 14,901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

The appellant petitioned for an order to sell real estate of his decedent for the payment of debts djiefrom the estate. The petition is in the usual form, and is verified. Issues were formed and the case was submitted to the court upon an agreed state of facts.

Counsel for the appellant assert that the proceedings constitute an agreed case under the statute providing for submitting agreed cases, but in this they are in error. An agreed state of facts is simply the result of an agreement of the parties as to what the evidence in the case will prove. Many cases recognize and enforce…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Riser v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Oppenheim v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Cole v. LafontaineIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Schadle v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Eikman v. LandwehrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Galesburg Coulter Disc Company v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Cleveland v. PalinIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API