Legal Opinion

Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Concorde Gaming Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 20, 2001No. 99-1058-CIV-HIGHSMITHPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HIGHSMITH, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for a bench trial from July 31, 2001 to August 2, 2001. The issues tried to the Court concerned whether a casino vessel, the Casino Princesa (hereinafter the “Princesa”), was accessible to Plaintiffs Daniel Ruiz and Luis Rodriguez, in compliance with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (hereinafter “Title III”), 42 U.S.C. § § 12181-12189. Upon due consideration of the evidence adduced at trail and the pertinent authorities, the Court finds:

I.FINDINGS OF FACT

The Parties

1.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Shotz v. CatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
  4. Matthew Staron, Jennifer Champagne, Brandon Naples, and Linda Ravenell v. McDonald Corporation and Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. John Doe and Richard Smith v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Small v. General Nutrition Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Access Now, Inc. v. South Florida Stadium Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  3. Rodriguez v. Investco, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  4. Brother v. CPL Investments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  5. Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API