Legal Opinion

Wright v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge JIULIANTE.

Frank Wright (Claimant) petitions for review of the June 30, 2004 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s claim petition on the ground that his injuries did not occur while he was in the course of his employment with Larpat Muffler, Inc. (Employer). Claimant contends that the Board erred in affirming the WCJ’s order because at the time of his injuries, he was required to be on Employer’s premises. We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Employer as a mechanic.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Kmart Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Giebel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Montgomery Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marazas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Trigon Holdings, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Morris v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. K.A. Fee v. Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. P. Marazas v. WCAB (Vitas Healthcare Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API