Marazas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
*857OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Paul Marazas (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant Claimant’s claim petition. After a remand, the WCJ awarded benefits, finding Claimant sustained his injury within the course and scope of his employment under Section 301(c) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 The Board reversed, concluding Claimant’s injury only related to work by way of his termination of the employment relationship. Claimant asserts judicial es-toppel precludes…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Casne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- J.L. Nagle. v. TrueBlue, Inc., Labor Ready, Inc. and Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. and Rye Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Starr Aviation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Colquitt)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Grill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pipeline Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Brad Remodeling, LLC (also referred to as Brad Remodeling, Inc.) v. WCAB (Morris)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.