Legal Opinion

Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1988No. Appeal 1845 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Claimant, Malcolm Gearhart, was employed by petitioner, Dana Corporation (employer), on December 30, 1983, when he suffered an injury after his work shift had ended. He had completed his shift at 3:00 p.m. and was walking through employers parking lot on the way to his car which was parked in the street when he stopped to assist a co-worker who was having trouble getting his car started. Claimant was struck by the coworker’s car when it unexpectedly moved backwards as claimant was positioning himself to help push it forward. Claimant suffered disabling injuries as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Newhouse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Pypers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Anzese v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Markle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bucknell University)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Vosburg v. ConnollySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Albright v. FaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API