Chadwick v. Multi-State Electric, LLC
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission holding that the claimant did not prove he was entitled to benefits under the Worker’s Compensation Law for an alleged back injury. We affirm the order of the Commission.
I
Factual Background.
On March 18, 2013, Scott M. Chadwick (“Claimant”) filed a complaint with the Industrial Commission seeking benefits under the Worker’s Compensation Law from his employer, Multi-State Electric, LLC (“Employer”), and its surety, Idaho State Insurance Fund (“Surety”). Claimant alleged that he had suffered back injuries as a result…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Eacret v. Clearwater Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miklos v. L&W SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 2026
- Miklos v. L&W SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 2026