Legal Opinion

Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2005No. 30391PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice Pro Tem.

This is an appeal seeking reversal of an order of the Idaho Industrial Commission. The claimant alleged an injury caused by standing from a sitting position. Following hearing, the Commission found in favor of the employer and denied the claim for benefits. There are two primary issues: 1) whether the claimant gave proper notice of the accident or the employer had sufficient knowledge of the injury; and 2) whether standing from a seated position constitutes an “accident” under the Idaho workers’ compensation law. We reverse and remand.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Zapata v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Reeder Flying ServiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Teurlings v. LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Eller v. Idaho State PoliceIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Fife v. Home Depot, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API