Humboldt M. Co. v. N.W. Pac. Ry. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a written agreement entered into between W. J. Swortzel and R. R. Smith, copartners under the firm name of Swortzel & Smith, of the one part, and Eel' River & Eureka Railroad Company, a corporation, of the other part. The plaintiff claims as assignee of the rights of Swortzel & Smith under said agreement, and seeks to hold the defendant as successor in interest to the said Eel River & Eureka Railroad Company.. The agreement in question was executed on March 27, 1901. Prior to that time, as the complaint avers,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ralph v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Shoenhair v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Champion Home Builders Co. v. SipesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- W. P. Herbert Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.