Ralph v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Z. B. West, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The automobile of one H. 0. Henderson was damaged in a collision with the automobile of Joseph Anderson. Archibald S. Ralph instituted the present action against said Joseph Anderson for damages, alleging that the collision was the result of defendant Anderson’s negligence and that said IT. 0. Henderson duly assigned, sold, and transferred his claim against the said defendant as sued for in this action “to the plaintiff herein [Ralph], who is now the owner and holder thereof.” Judgment having been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, defendant appeals upon the ground that the evidence is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Merrill v. KohlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Swift v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Grant v. HeverinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Reios v. MardisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Swing v. LingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.