Legal Opinion

Tell v. Wolke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

We need not consider seriously the order denying the motion for summary judgment. Admittedly the motion was brought to discover whether the district attorney, after the first preliminary examination, had discovered evidence which was not in his possession at the time of the first examination upon which he caused the second complaint and warrant to be issued. The motion served the plaintiff’s purpose and no error is assigned relating to the grounds of the denial of the motion for summary judgment. But if error was committed, it is immaterial as the same question of law which would have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Montgomery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. FishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Campbell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State Ex Rel. Kowaleski v. KubiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Richmond v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. KenyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Robert Watts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. Bailey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API