Hansen v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Five issues are presented on this review:
1. Is the evidence sufficient to support the conviction?
2. Did the court err in its handling of defense witnesses?
3. Was the closing argument of the prosecutor prejudicial?
4. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?
5. Should the sentence be modified ?
Sufficiency of the evidence.
To convict a person of violation of sec. 943.12, Stats., 1 three elements must he proven: (1) Possession of any device or instrumentality designed and adapted for use in breaking into any depository for the safekeeping of any valuables or into any building or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Bautista v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Strait v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Ben Sanders, Jr. v. Thomas R. Israel and Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Vanlue v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.