Legal Opinion

J.M. v. D.A.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2010No. 43A03-1003-DR-183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

J.M. ("Father") appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to modify child sup*1237port and the trial court's finding that Father was in contempt. Father raises two issues, which we revise and restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred by denying Father's petition to modify child support; and

II. Whether the trial court erred by finding Father in contempt.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The relevant facts follow. D.A. ("Moth er") and Father were married and had two children, B.M., who was born on February 10, 1999, and MM., who was born on September 11, 2000. On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jm v. DaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Luis Antonio Palacio v. Raquel VillavicencioIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. N.F. v. J.T.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API