Legal Opinion

Luis Antonio Palacio v. Raquel Villavicencio

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2014No. 49A02-1305-DR-397Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, Jan 10 2014, 9:22 am collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: R. ALLAN KUHLMAN AARON WESTLAKE Indianapolis, Indiana Thomas Law Firm, P.C. Auburn, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA LUIS ANTONIO PALACIO, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. 49A02-1305-DR-397 ) RAQUEL VILLAVICENCIO, ) ) Appellee-Petitioner. ) APPEAL FROM THE MARION SUPERIOR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacLafferty v. MacLaffertyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Saalfrank v. SaalfrankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. J.M. v. D.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API