Legal Opinion

Jm v. Da

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2010No. 43A03-1003-DR-183Published

1Opinion of the Court

935 N.E.2d 1235 (2010)

J.M., Appellant-Respondent,

v.

D.A., Appellee-Petitioner.

No. 43A03-1003-DR-183.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

October 29, 2010.

Craig A. Dechert, Kokomo, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Frances Barrow, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

J.M. ("Father") appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to modify child support and the trial court's finding that Father was in contempt. Father raises two issues, which we revise and restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred by denying…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API