Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Chalat

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 16, 2005No. 04SC232PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Justice.

Petitioner seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s order obligating Respondent to pay his daughter’s full postsecondary education expenses pursuant to a 1984 decree of dissolution. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Respondent’s agreement to pay his daughter’s college expenses is not enforceable as a contract term. Rather, Respondent’s agreement was adopted by the trial court and incorporated into the court’s decree of dissolution. As a result, the trial court retains continuing jurisdiction to modify its orders concerning the daughter,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Pierson v. Black Canyon Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of IkelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Tulips Investments, LLC v. State of Colorado ex rel.Suthers, Colorado Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. Sooper Credit Union v. Sholar Group Architects, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. In re N.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In Re the Marriage of HillColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API