Legal Opinion

Hunke v. Foote

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1962No. 9061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the district court granting a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring appellants (defendants) as administrative officers, mayor and councilmen of the city of Idaho Falls (hereinafter referred to as City) to remove an electrical substation from an area zoned by the city ordinance as residential. Respondents (plaintiffs) are residents of and taxpayers in the immediate vicinity of such substation.

The City owned parcel of land involved is rectangular in shape and is situate in the northwest portion of Temple View Park, a subdivision of the City,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Township of Washington v. Village of RidgewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. CallisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rupp v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Clark v. Town of Estes ParkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency v. CountrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API