Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency v. Countryman
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOYLE, Justice.
In this original proceeding we are called upon to determine whether sufficient reasons and extraordinary conditions exist to warrant issuance of a writ of mandamus.1
The city of Idaho Falls established the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter “Agency”) pursuant to the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965. I.C. § 50-2001 et seq. The Idaho Urban Renewal Law authorizes each municipality within the state of Idaho to establish an “urban renewal agency” for the purpose of undertaking “urban renewal projects”. See I.C. § 50-2006; § 50-2007. As amended in 1987, the Idaho Urban…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Mickelsen v. City of RexburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Beem v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Sweeney v. OtterIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Musser v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Edwards v. Industrial Commission of the StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Rogers v. Gooding Public Joint School District No. 231Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.