Legal Opinion

Horton v. Haines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1909No. 54PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cleveland County; C. F. Irwin, Judge. Action by W. R. Haines against S. A. Horton and others. Judgment for. plaintiff,,■ and defendant Horton brings error. On requisites of summons: George v. Hatton, 2 Kan. 333; Weaver v. Gardner, 14 Kan. 348; Beverly v. Fairchild (Kan.) 27 Pac. 985. On sufficiency of petition: Short >u.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Cleveland County; C. F. Irwin, Judge. Action by W. R. Haines against S. A. Horton and others. Judgment for. plaintiff,,■ and defendant Horton brings error. On requisites of summons: George v. Hatton, 2 Kan. 333; Weaver v. Gardner, 14 Kan. 348; Beverly v. Fairchild (Kan.) 27 Pac. 985. On sufficiency of petition: Short >u. Nooner, 16 Kan. 227. On court’s discretion as to ñling motions out of time: Neitzel v. Hunter, 19 Kan. 221; Swerdsferger v. State, 21 Kan. 475; Tefft v. Firey, 22 Kan. 753; Railway Go. v. Linson, 39 Kan. 416.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This was a suit upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure payment of same. The note and mortgage were executed by the defendant in error James TI. Love and Mary A. Love, and made payable to the Union Central Life Insurance Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and by it assigned and transferred to W. R. Haines, one of. the defendants in error, who was plaintiff below; the plaintiff in error, S. Á. Horton, and James H. Love and Mary A. Love, being defendants. While the plaintiff in error never filed any formal pleadings disclosing the interest he claimed in the premises, he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglass v. NuzumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Frost v. . KoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Guthrie v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Maharry and Ray v. MaharrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Swerdsfeger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Littlefield v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Keck v. BrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API