Legal Opinion

People v. Lively

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2004No. Docket 123145PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C. J.

We granted leave to appeal1 to consider whether the materiality of a false statement is an element of the statutory offense of perjury, MCL 750.422 and 750.423. The Court of Appeals held that materiality is an element that must be submitted to the jury,2 but the plain language of MCL 750.423 sets forth a definition of perjury that does not require proof of materiality. Because the Legislature has decided that materiality is not an element, the trial court did not err in refusing to submit that issue to the jury. We thus reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate defendant’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. MendozaMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. ArmistedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API