Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Insurance v. Howell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff having appointed defendant Howell its general agent, a contract was executed between them, and a bond, signed by Howell as principal and the other defendants as sureties, was delivered to the plaintiff, upon which bond this action was brought, a copy of the bond being served with the declaration. The plea was the general issue, and no affidavit denying the execution of the bond was filed under Circuit Court Rule No. 79. Hpon the trial it appeared that the parties to the contract had dealings under it, and that advances were made to Howell by the company, commencing in January,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ada Dairy Ass'n v. MearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Bly v. BradyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Miller v. Prussian National InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API