Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco. . (Tuttle, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This is the same case as that reported in 61 Mich. 454 (28 N. W. Rep. 663), where a judgment for the plaintiff was set aside and a new trial ordered. It has again been tried, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant.
The facts of the case are not materially variant, as presented by the plaintiff, from those which appeared upon the former trial, and. a restatement of them here is unnecessary. In the opinion then delivered the law of' the case was settled, and the circuit judge has upon the retrial conformed to that opinion. We do not think that any of the rulings upon the admission…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Union Central Life Insurance v. HowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894