Legal Opinion

Miller v. Prussian National Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1909No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by Kirby Miller against the Prussian National Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit upon a Michigan standard insurance policy of $1,000 issued by defendant to him insuring certain personal property, to wit, $350 on certain liquors, tobacco, and cigars, $350 on saloon furniture and fixtures, including a safe and cash register; and $300 on his household goods, etc., situated in a building occupied by him as a saloon and dwelling in Mill-brook, Mich. The policy issued for one year, and was dated November 21, 1903, and was written upon an oral application. The declaration was in the form permitted by rule in this State. The execution of the policy declared…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Union Central Life Insurance v. HowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Simon v. Home InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston Ins. Co. v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Grimme v. General Council of Fraternal Aid Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Person v. J. H. Worden Lumber & Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API