Legal Opinion
Halloway v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 25, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 7412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether, under the implied consent law, the state must prove that a breath test, even though refused, was in compliance with statutory and Department of Health Services standards before ordering a license suspension. We hold that such proof is not necessary and affirm the suspension decision.
The facts are undisputed. On September 17, 1982, a Department of Public Safety Officer observed the appellant weaving and exceeding the speed limit on 1-17 in the city of Phoenix. The appellant was stopped, and the officer thereafter detected the odor of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Woolman v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Martin v. Super. Ct. in & for Cty. of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Bell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conahan v. DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Robinson v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- In re Suspension of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Malveaux v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.