Legal Opinion

Martin v. Super. Ct. in & for Cty. of Maricopa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1983No. 16244-SAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Respondent Frank Yue’s driver’s license was suspended by order of the Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (MVD), pursuant- to Arizona’s implied consent law, A.R.S. § 28-691. On review, the superior court vacated that order and granted the Department the right to re quire respondent to appear for another hearing in accordance with the court’s opinion. Petitioner has filed this Special Action urging reversal of the superior court’s action. Considering the constitutional nature of the respondent court’s ruling, the number per month of MVD hearings which are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Anderson v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pladson v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Berenter v. GallingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Pavlik v. Chinle Unified School District No. 24Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API