Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 22, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6756, 1 CA-CIV 6840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

In both of these cases, individuals were arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and were advised that failure to submit to an intoxication test would result in the suspension of their respective licenses under the implied consent statute, A.R.S. § 28-691(B). Both refused to submit to the test. However, neither was advised that he or she had a right to have a second sample of the test taken and preserved in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Baca v. Smith, 124 Ariz. 353, 604 P.2d 617 (1979).

The question presented in these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Connolly v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Werner v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Diaz v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Tyers v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API