Attorney General ex rel. Fuller v. Parsell
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in tlie nature of quo warranto to test the title to the office of warden of the State House of Correction and Reformatory at Ionia. Argued April 3, 1894. Judgment of ouster entered. May 4, 1894. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 98 Mich. 96, and 99 Id. 381.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Two opinions have already been rendered in this case. Fuller v. Attorney General, 98 Mich. 96; Attorney General v. Parsell, 99 Id. 381. In the first of these cases, various questions were raised, and the constitutionality of the law (Act No. 118, Laws of 1893) was attacked. The cases required much labor, and covered all the issues of fact and of law then supposed to be involved. Under these decisions, nothing really remained but to enter a judgment of ouster. After the last opinion was filed, the respondent, without leave of the Court, filed an additional demurrer, and now challenges the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Fuller v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- School District No. Two v. StoughNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Evans Products Co. v. State Board of EscheatsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Washtenaw County Road Commissioners v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Smock v. Farmers' Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- People v. StimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.