North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach Village
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
A person is a necessary party to an action when he is so vitally interested in the controversy involved in the action that a valid judgment cannot be rendered in the action completely and finally determining the controversy without his presence as a party. Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485, 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968). Plaintiff contends that the individual lot owners who have a recorded easement in the condemned common area are not necessary parties for a determination of the just compensation for the common areas. As we hold those owners of the easement have a material…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conleys Creek Ltd. P'ship v. Smoky Mountain Country Club Prop. Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Wallach v. Linville Owners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Dep't of Transp. v. Fernwood Hill TownhomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Great Smoky Mountains R.R., LLC v. Mach 2 Invs., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026