Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Columbus
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
While the allegations of the petition that the prosecutions and threatened prosecutions of the plaintiff’s employees would injure its business were admitted, the defendant denied that such injury would cause irreparable damage, and denied the right of the plaintiff to refuse to pay the tax complained of. Equity will not enjoin a criminal prosecution solely to prevent such a prosecution, but it will in any proper case, by injunction or otherwise, prevent injury or destruction of property. Carey v. Atlanta, 143 Ga. 192 (2) (84 S. E. 456, L. R. A. 1915D, 684, Ann. Cas. 1916E,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Carey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Mayor of Savannah v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Mystyle Hosiery Shops Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Cravey v. Southeastern Underwriters Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Snow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Department of Transportation v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- City of Albany v. LippittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.