Legal Opinion
City of Albany v. Lippitt
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 12, 1941No. 13622PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The sufficiency of the petition is challenged by the demurrer on the grounds that no cause of action is alleged, that it contains no equity, and that petitioner has an adequate remedy at law. The demurrer admits all properly pleaded allegations in the petition, and they must be considered as true in passing upon the demurrer. Code, § 81-304; Citizens & Southern National Bank v. King, 184 Ga. 238 (190 S. E. 857); Baldwin v. Dawson, 41 Ga. App. 90 (2) (151 S. E. 825). The petition shows that the plaintiff is the sole and exclusive owner of the grass plot between the sidewalk…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Bearce v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
- City of Atlanta v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Brown v. City of East PointSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Moultrie Milk Shed Inc. v. City of CairoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- City of Cedartown v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Adams v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- K. Gordon Murray Productions, Inc. v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.