Legal Opinion
Boland v. Smith & Rogers Construction L.T.D.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 19, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1386PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs in this ERISA action — trustees of two union pension funds — seek to recover late fees from an Ohio-based construction company and to conduct an audit of the company’s books and records, from November 2009 onward, to determine if there are any delinquent contributions. Despite having been properly served, the company has not responded to the complaint, the Clerk’s entry of default, or the Court’s order to show cause as to why judgment should not be entered against it. Plaintiffs now request an entry of default…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boland v. ELITE TERRAZZO FLOORING, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Jpr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Fanning v. Permanent Solution Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Boland v. Providence Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Boland v. Yoccabel Construction Company, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Kel-Tech Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Boland v. HetrickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Conn. Stone Indus., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fanning v. Seneca One Realty LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Service Employees International National Industry Pension Fund v. Tandem Development CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.