Legal Opinion

Gemma v. Gemma

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 18821PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

The district court determined in this divorce action that the respondent Lois Gemma had a community property interest in her husband’s, appellant Joseph Gemma, Jr., police retirement pension even though his pension rights had not vested, and that she could elect to receive pension benefits when appellant was first eligible to retire. Appellant objects to a nonvested pension interest being considered community property; and if it is, he opposes his former wife’s ability to receive her share of benefits beginning when he is first eligible to retire. We reject…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Woodward v. WoodwardUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Hare v. HodginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API