Gemma v. Gemma
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, J.:
The district court determined in this divorce action that the respondent Lois Gemma had a community property interest in her husband’s, appellant Joseph Gemma, Jr., police retirement pension even though his pension rights had not vested, and that she could elect to receive pension benefits when appellant was first eligible to retire. Appellant objects to a nonvested pension interest being considered community property; and if it is, he opposes his former wife’s ability to receive her share of benefits beginning when he is first eligible to retire. We reject…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Woodward v. WoodwardUtah Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cohen v. CohenTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Hare v. HodginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.