Legal Opinion

Hare v. Hodgins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 9, 1991No. 90-C-2405, 90-C-2445PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

586 So.2d 118 (1991)

Audrey Coogan Hodgins HARE

v.

Norman F. HODGINS.

Nos. 90-C-2405, 90-C-2445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 9, 1991.

Philip R. Riegel, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff.

Floyd J. Reed, Reed & Reed, New Orleans, for defendant.

DENNIS, Justice.

We granted certiorari to decide whether the court of appeal correctly partitioned a divorced couple's community property interest in the employee spouse's defined benefits pension after it matured in 1988. The trial court divided the community interest by awarding the non-employee spouse a fixed percentage of the pensioner's retirement…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Ruggles v. RugglesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Andrepont v. Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Juneau v. StrawmyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API