Legal Opinion

Marsh v. INTERSTATE & OCEAN TRANSPORT CO.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 11, 1981No. Civ. A. 77-398PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, a seaman, initiated this suit to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on April 18, 1975 on board a barge named “Tide 119” and owned and operated by defendant Interstate and Ocean Transport Company (“Interstate”). The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff and awarded damages totalling $100,000. In response to special interrogatories, the Jury found that defendant Interstate was negligent and that plaintiff was not contributorily negligent. The Jury’s award of damages was apportioned as follows:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Mroz v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Louis W. Silverii, Administrator of the Estate of Dominick J. Mash, Deceased v. Wilson Kramer and John W. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. Brown v. McBro Planning and Development Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1987
  3. William J. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API