Legal Opinion
Clinch v. Generali-U.S. Branch
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 2, 2008No. AC 28784PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Stephen Clinch, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Generali-U.S. Branch. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the defendant had no duty to defend its insured in an action that the plaintiff had brought against the insured and, thus, improperly failed to grant his motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant’s motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On or about September 20, 1997, the plaintiff was a customer and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Markey v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Community Renewal Team, Inc. v. United States Liability InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Clinch v. Generali-U.S. BranchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Allstate Insurance v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Socci v. PasiakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.