Joyce v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Joyce, plaintiff in error, to be called defendant, together with five others, was convicted of a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act. Joyce brought writ of error to this court.
The defendant has argued that the evidence was not sufficient to justify conviction. But there was ample to require submission of the issues to the jury and to sustain the verdict. According to the witnesses for the prosecution, in the premises described as the Hillsdale Hotel, Nos. 47 and 51 Sixth street, was a long bar, divided by a partition running from the “barroom” to the south…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Phelps v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Le More v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Mannix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- McDonough v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Baugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Allred v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.