London v. Harris
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
This is a will contest. The question: Where the sole surviving attesting “witness” denies that she affixed her signature to the will as an attesting witness, may other evidence be admitted to prove the execution and attestation? Contestants/appellants, Billy London, Edward London, and Tommy London argue that such evidence is inadmissible, citing Code 1975, § 43-8-167. Proponent/appellee, James A. Harris, Jr., contends that such evidence is admissible. We agree with the proponent and affirm.
This appeal involves the wills of James A. Harris (“Archie”) and Ida Mae Harris, husband…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Massey v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Hall's Heirs v. Hall's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Staples v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991