Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Massey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1929No. 6 Div. 21PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is the third appeal in this case. As will appear from the reports of the former appeals, the purpose of the pro ceeding is to probate the alleged will of Isham Eastis, deceased, propounded for probate by the appellees, and contested by appellants on the ground that the will was not executed in conformity with the statute, Code of 1&23, § 10508.

It appears from the record, and is conceded in argument, that contestants offered no evidence, and that the issue was submitted and determined on the evidence adduced by the proponents. The first two trials resulted in denying the petition for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Snider v. BurksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Voyager Life Ins. Co., Inc. v. WhitsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Little v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Dortch Baking Co. v. SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Whitt v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API