Legal Opinion
National Auto Brokers Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1973No. Nos. 70 Civ. 5421B, 72 Civ. 5438 and 72 Civ. 3515PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIESA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in each of these related antitrust cases have filed motions for class action treatment. Time Incorporated— one of the defendants in the Ambook case—has filed a motion requesting the Court to deny class action treatment in that case.
Two parties—Kings Electronics Co., Inc. and Olympia Theatre Co.—have moved to intervene as plaintiffs in the Ambook action. Finally, there is a motion in the Ambook case for leave to file a second amended complaint.
/The motions by the various plaintiffs 'in the three actions for class action treatment are denied in all respects.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Coye Peterson v. The Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a Public Corporation and State AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.