Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Harrington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to St. Clair. Trover. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Plaintiffs in error were sued in trover for cutting and removing certain timber from off the lands of Daniel B. Harrington. That they were mere naked trespassers was not seriously questioned. They insisted however that the plaintiffs below were bound to show a clear and undisputed title to the lands trespassed on in order to recover. It is sufficient to say that Harrington was in possession under claim and color of title, and this as against a trespasser was sufficient. The validity of the conveyances to him are hardly open to question in the present ease, and we shall therefore express no…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kerr v. LunsfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hartley v. A. I. Rodd Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Morrison v. Cottonwood Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Western Gas Const. Co. v. DannerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API