Morrison v. Cottonwood Development Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ItiNER, Justice.
The Cottonwood Development Company, defendant in error here and hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, is a corporation organized under Wyoming law and vested by that law with the power of eminent domain. Needing a right of way for its irrigation canal, it instituted — in the District Court of Fremont County — two actions for the condemnation thereof. In one action Caroline Rich, Helen Milliken, Mary Wright, Elizabeth Miller, Agnes C. Burk, W. I. Todd and A. P. Summers were made defendants. In the other action John H. Morrison was the sole defendant. The eases were…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hance v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Reed v. WadsworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Reed v. HunterWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.