Legal Opinion

Sidney Frank Importing Co. v. Beam Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 14, 2014No. 13-CV-1391 (NSR)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NELSON S. ROMÁN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sidney Frank Importing Co., Inc. (“SFIC” or “Plaintiff’) commenced the instant action against Beam Inc. (“Beam”) and Cooley Distillery pic (“Cooley”) (collectively “Defendants”) seeking monetary damages for Cooley’s alleged breach of a long-term service contract, Beam’s alleged violation of common law unfair competition, and Beam’s alleged tortious interference with business relations. Defendant now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kolb v. ACRA Control, Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  2. SCO Group, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Carson Optical Inc. v. eBay Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Ace Arts, LLC v. Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API