Legal Opinion
Vehicular Technologies Corp. v. Titan Wheel International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 22, 2000No. 99-1042PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM. Circuit Judge RADER concurs.
2Per curiam
The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the motion of Titan Wheel International, Inc., Dyneer Corp., Transamerica Auto Parts Co., Inc., and Leon Rosser Auto Service, Inc. (collectively Tractech) for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,413,015 (the ’015 patent), assigned to Vehicular Technologies Corporation (PowerTrax). Because the comparable assembly in the accused E-Z Locker product contains a single spring and a plug, the district court found that it cannot, as…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/ACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Michilin Prosperity Co. v. Fellowes Manufacturing Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Jang v. Boston Scientific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.